Adaptation of mobile learning in higher

The survey shows that most students own and use smartphones for learning purposes, but a closer look reveals a variation by age and college level. Students did report an increase in use of some apps, including navigation from 48 to 57 percententertainment 47 to 52 percentand books 19 to 27 percent.

I would use m-learning if it was recommended to me by Adaptation of mobile learning in higher lecturers. My interaction with an m-learning system would be clear and understandable EE4. Implications for a changing workforce. Information Systems Research, 13 1 Test of competing theories.

There are several issues facing the adoption of m-learning, and there are pedagogical issues regarding the use of mobile devices in classrooms; will it disturb the learning process?

An empirical analysis of the adoption of m-learning in Malaysia. Creating a professional development course can also foster collaboration among instructors interested in the technology, while creating a knowledge base of best practices for each individual instructor.

This is in agreement with previous research results Igbaria et al. The results of this research extend the UTAUT in the context of m-learning acceptance by adding quality of service and personal innovativeness to the structure of UTAUT and provide practitioners and educators with useful guidelines for designing a successful m-learning system.

Using m-learning in my studying would not increase my learning productivity. Our open-ended questions to students supplemented the findings: The research model to be tested in this study is shown in Figure 3.

Davis demonstrated that perceived usefulness is the most frequent factor used to decide a higher or lower adoption rate. The learning management system in Brunel University offers a series of online courses that can be accessed via Blackboard. Data Analysis and Results The data analysis method consisted of two steps.

Practically, we need institutional changes that can facilitate and encourage students and instructors to integrate mobile technology into daily learning.

Three items, including items PE4, QoS3, and QoS5, were eliminated due to its standardized factor loadings value, which was less than 0. The researchers combined two additional constructs into the UTAUT in order to apply this theory for m-learning acceptance; they added perceived playfulness and self-management of learning.

This research attempted to study which performance expectancy of m-learning will influence student behavioural intention to use m-learning.

Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance ofinformation technology. Key Issues Despite high ownership, longitudinal data indicates that use of mobile technology in learning is not as widespread as the devices themselves. Table 5 shows model-fit indices as well as the recommended thresholds.

A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision making processes. However, the largest increases were in the categories of reference from 17 to 39 percentUCF apps from 24 to 38 percentand photography from 38 to 52 percent.

December – 2013

The survey comparison between and indicates that ownership of mobile devices continues to grow, and more students are using smartphones for learning a 19 percent increase. The characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 2.

Use of mobile technology for teaching and learning is still an emergent area for study, and more scholarly research must be conducted. Device ownership comparison, and As figure 8 shows, percentages did not significantly increase in use of social and music apps, which remained the two highest categories at 79 and 74 percent, respectively.

However, according to our participants, instructors rarely required mobile device use to complete assignments; respondents said only 19 percent of instructors required smartphone use, 13 percent required tablets, and 6 percent required book readers.

Students' Mobile Learning Practices in Higher Education: A Multi-Year Study

Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry defined consumer expectation of quality of service as what they think a service provider should offer rather than what they would offer. We distributed the survey through an e-mail sent to all students, as well as announcements in courses that granted us permission.

Cavus and Ibrahim investigated the ability of learning new English language words using short message service SMS.OPEN ACCESS Asian Journal of Scientific Research ISSN DOI: /ajsr Research Article Determinants of Mobile Learning Adoption in Higher Education Setting 1M.N.

Masrek and 2I. Samadi 1Faculty of Information Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia 2Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. mobile learning in higher education: an empirical assessment OF A NEW EDUCATIONAL TOOL Douglas MCCONATHA, Matt PRAUL, West Chester University of Pennsylvania.

BARRIERS TO M-LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN NIGERIA further mentioned the lack of technical experts in the mobile learning field and adaptation of mobile software for the Nigerian educational curriculum as some of the challenges facing m-learning in higher education institutions in Nigeria.

While their research is a. understanding of students’ usage of mobile learning systems in higher education, and provide timely guidance for its development and implementation. Keywords: Mobile As mobile technology has matured sufficiently in recent years to support advanced learning activities, its adaptation for this purpose has spread globally.

This is natural. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review is to provide the scholarly community with a current synthesis of mobile learning research in higher education settings.

Background. Mobile Learning is a term to denote learning involving the use of a mobile device. Adaptation of Learning Spaces: Supporting Ubiquitous Learning in Higher Distance Education Birgit Bomsdorf the objective of which is the adaptation of learning resources to dif- pilot, digital cameras, mobile phones, PDAs, etc.

Adaptation of mobile learning in higher
Rated 3/5 based on 96 review