With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. Brady and his wife because proponents of gun control after Brady was shot and seriously wounded during the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan 4.
Advocates of stricter gun control laws have tended to stress that the amendment"s militia clause guarantees nothing to the individual and that it only protects the states" rights to be able to maintain organized military units. SAF  Freedman, Warren. Opponents of gun control laws, including organizations such as the National Rifle Association NRAobject to the inconvenience these laws may cause to law-abiding gun buyers or owners and would not prevent the possession of guns by criminals.
Another hindering factor is that in spite of the public majority being in favor of stricter gun control, the states are moving in a different direction. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals" access to Second amendment research paper, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument.
The opposite side of this debate consists of those who claim that the amendment guarantees some sort of individual right to arms. I believe that the Second Amendment of the Constitution was put into place in order to protect the collective right, and ensure the safety of the American people, though these days, it seems as though some of the citizens may be more in need of rescue from themselves, rather than a tyrannical government.
Effectively taking away the right to bear and keep arms would only take the power from the people, and give it back to the government, circumventing the original point that the Constitution was trying to uphold in the first place, which constituted a government for the people, by the people.
They claim, on the basis of loose interpretations of the Second Amendment, that the right to keep and bear arms was extended only as far as state militiamen, and was in fact never granted to individual countrymen. The Missing Piece My argument is that D. Beginning of gun bans and the reasoning behind it B.
This was the first time that the Second Amendment was judged in favor of protecting the right of citizens to own firearms, and use them in defense of their homes.
Quorum Books,  Hickok, Eugene Jr. Pros and Cons on the right of owning firearms III. Miller, the founding fathers would not have found a sawed off shot gun that crossed state lines to be part of a militia covered under the Second Amendment.
The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only.
The future of firearms. The surviving aspect of the U. Are firearms the true cause in the increase of violence E. However, this response fails, because it was about historical accuracy rather than current relevancy. Furthermore, in addition to questioning the validity of the phrase, many people question the literal meaning of the Second Amendment.
Reasons for this course of action B. What was distinctive about this ruling, versus other cases, was that both sides of the court argued over the history behind the amendment itself, in order to reach a conclusion.
Gun Control and the Constitution: Miller, the claim about the right to bear arms was never explicitly addressed. These gun control advocates argue that the Second Amendment grew out of the colonists" fear of standing armies and their belief that having militias that were composed of ordinary citizens was the surest way of maintaining their freedom 3.
Currently public opinion seems to be in favor of having tighter gun restrictions as was shown with the passing of the Brady Bill.
Federal and state laws also prohibit minors from purchasing guns. The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. Guarantees of individual liberties under federalism have two components: Once these things are taken into consideration only then will our "right to bear arms" be clearly defined.
The Second Amendment, written by James Madison, states that "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
When the English kings who started employing tyrannical methods against their subjects who were not loyal to the crown, the right to bear arms was the way for the people of England to prevent royal tyranny. Attacks involving a gun are five times more likely to result in a death than in any similar attacks made with a knife.
What happens if one right is taken away A. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. Miller case was that it limited the scope of the word "arms" to the standard of "what is commonly in use at the time", touching on the same idea of history, but in a more current setting.
Justice Scalia lay out that the "right to bear and keep arms" was understood by the original framers of the constitution as a pre-existing right belonging to each individual citizen.
With this statement, the founders of this country explicitly and perpetually guaranteed the American individual the right to keep and bear arms. Why were firearms written in as a right of the American citizen?Discussing Controversial Topics: The Second Amendment Summary This summer several mass shootings occurred in the United States.
In July, a gunman opened fire in a crowded movie theatre in Aurora, Colorado, killing 12 and wounding In early August, six were killed and three were injured at a Sikh temple outside of Milwaukee.
Research Papers. The Controversy of the Second Amendment of the Constitution - I. INTRODUCTION: The Second Amendment to the Constitution(Second Amendment) of the United States of America(USA) is one of the most controversial.
Reaffirming the Second Amendment Purpose: This paper aims to provide an analytic review of the. 2nd Amendment Paper As a 23 year old female, who is an avid hunter, I would like to state that I am a major supporter of the Second Amendment.
I have been raised in a family of hunters, cops, and military veterans.
In the case District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the "Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful.
Essay/Term paper: The second amendment and the right to bear arms Essay, term paper, research paper: Gun Control See all college papers and term papers on. The Second Amendment has often been the subject of debate, and over the years varying speculations and interpretations of its intended meaning have forced this significant phrase into a controversial spotlight.Download